The reality of the CJP protest is far from the fake narrative being pushed...
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- 3 hours ago
- 3 min read
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
The reality of the CJP protest is far from the fake narrative being pushed. Across the entire duration and locations, the actual Gen Z student participation never even touched a lakh, with many attending under coaching class pressure, some just to watch, and others to create social media content. In contrast, Bhim Army and Namazwadi Party workers with criminal backgrounds were visibly present, and police data shows 2402 criminals identified via crime records and 471 through dossiers—covering charges from murder, rape, robbery, arms violations, to narcotics. Supreme Court has made clear FIRs against them will not be quashed. Yet the entire Gen Z generation is being vilified, even though 99.99% stayed away. With 38 crore Gen Z voters eligible in 2029, this smear campaign is clearly political. Criticize specific wrongdoers, not an entire generation.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
Reports of a massive MH-CET exam scam are surfacing, with allegations against children of a BJP leader who both scored identical percentiles, raising suspicion. Shockingly, students with just 30–40% in Class 12 have secured 99 percentile in CET, while viral calls offered such scores for money. Officials tried to deflect by citing JEE examples, but that comparison fails since JEE syllabus differs, whereas CET and Maharashtra board exams share the same syllabus—making correlation unavoidable. Meanwhile, MPSC’s Drug Inspector exam paper leak has also been alleged, with police raiding a girl’s house after claims that 92 questions were circulated on WhatsApp days before the test. With data and evidence already public, both cases demand impartial investigation to restore credibility in the examination system.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
Supreme Court has thrown CJP’s demand for “full protection” into the dustbin, making it clear that FIRs must be registered. The Court drew a sharp line—peaceful protest rights will be safeguarded, but criminal acts cannot be shielded. Importantly, students with no criminal background will not face harsh or coercive action. At the same time, the Court ordered that CCTV footage, drone recordings, body-cam visuals, wireless logs, and PCR call records must be preserved to ensure transparency. It also banned the public disclosure of personal details of protestors, protecting their privacy. This ruling underscores that while democratic dissent is protected, law and order cannot be compromised, and accountability for unlawful behavior remains non-negotiable. It is a balanced stance—rights safeguarded, crimes investigated.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
She once posted a disgusting photo with a Shivling and was heavily targeted by Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal government for that act. During the Bengal assembly election campaign, she even recited Kalma, which drew sharp criticism from BJP supporters who mocked her relentlessly. Yet today, the same woman has conveniently become a BJP ally, suddenly treated as “pure” and beyond reproach. The hypocrisy is glaring—those who once attacked her character now remain silent, unwilling to question her because she serves their political purpose. This transformation exposes the opportunism at play: yesterday’s “enemy” is today’s “partner,” and the same voices that condemned her actions now pretend they never happened. It shows how quickly principles are abandoned when power and expediency demand it.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
Delhi Police revealed that their face recognition system identified over 2800 individuals at the Jantar Mantar protest with prior criminal involvement. Yet chief cockroach Abhijit Dipke shamelessly claimed it was a “student protest” and denied responsibility for who joined. How absurd—if you organize a protest, you are accountable for who attends, what they do, and how the event unfolds. Dipke, along with Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, cannot escape this duty. They demand ministers resign for systemic failures in education, arguing ultimate responsibility lies at the top, but when crimes occur at their own protest, they conveniently disown accountability. This hypocrisy exposes them as cowardly cockroaches—loud in rhetoric, silent in responsibility. Their refusal to own even basic duties shows their true nature: escapist, irresponsible, and utterly unfit for leadership.
🔽
Comments