top of page

When a journalist dismisses Vedic traditions with a mocking question...

  • dhadakkamgarunion0
  • 2 hours ago
  • 3 min read

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

When a journalist dismisses Vedic traditions with a mocking question, it reveals more about his ideological bias than about the rituals themselves. In Sanatan Dharma, sacred acts are performed with Agni as witness, a truth overlooked by those eager to trivialize faith. The irony deepens when progressive voices ignore another pressing question: why, in a society with abundant Muslim women, did Arif Tashe and his brothers choose Hindu brides? This silence exposes selective outrage—quick to ridicule Hindu customs, yet hesitant to probe choices that challenge communal narratives. True journalism demands balance, not prejudice. Faith and marriage are personal, but when commentary becomes one-sided, it ceases to be inquiry and turns into propaganda. The real issue is not ritual or religion, but the erosion of fairness in public discourse.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

“You Reap What You Sow” This saying captures the essence of the current situation. In Kashmir, protests triggered by events in Iran could have remained a short-lived democratic expression. But when demonstrations persist beyond reason, authorities are forced to intervene. Iran’s political maneuvers have often fueled unrest in Sunni-majority regions, leaving trails of bloodshed in Gaza, Syria, and Yemen. Yet, some continue to glorify it without understanding the deeper realities. Speaking or writing without knowledge only spreads confusion. For India, the lesson is straightforward—progress depends on peace, responsibility, and truth. If seeds of discord are sown, the harvest will inevitably be turmoil. Expecting harmony from chaos is nothing but self-deception.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane 

In a dramatic turn, the U.S. discovered that Iran’s late Supreme Leader had created a decentralized “Dead Hand” system—capable of launching drones, missiles, and cyberattacks without new orders. Unlike Russia’s Cold War nuclear mechanism, Iran’s version works through pre‑programmed commands, ensuring retaliation even after leadership is eliminated. America’s mistake was eliminating every identifiable commander, leaving no one alive to negotiate. As a result, ongoing strikes are not directed by new leaders but by instructions set months earlier. India too faces consequences: oil supplies from Iran are halted, shipping routes blocked, and diplomatic isolation deepened after abandoning neutrality. With fuel prices soaring and Gulf tensions escalating, the world is trapped in a dangerous spiral. Stopping this war now requires either regime change in Iran or catastrophic destruction—an outcome that threatens the entire region.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

Tensions in the Gulf have intensified. Reports claim U.S. Special Forces faced resistance from Iraq’s Shia militia, with some commandos allegedly captured—though Washington denies this. Overnight, Iran struck the American helicopter base in Kuwait, destroying fuel tanks, hangars, and radar systems. Bahrain’s BAPCO refinery was hit by missiles, forcing closure and cutting supplies to the U.S. Fifth Fleet. In retaliation, U.S. forces attacked Iranian crude tankers near Bandar Abbas. Meanwhile, Iran’s new leader Mojtaba Khamenei oversaw massive missile and drone strikes on Israel and twelve other nations. Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, have reduced or halted oil production as Hormuz Strait remains blocked. Fuel prices are soaring globally, while Russia’s crude industry benefits from the disruption. The conflict now threatens regional stability and global energy security.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

The Nordic countries’ declaration to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu marks a historic rupture in diplomatic norms. Rarely has an entire regional bloc threatened legal action against a sitting head of government, effectively closing vital trans-Atlantic corridors. This stance underscores Europe’s growing divergence from U.S. military strategy, as Washington unleashes its forces while Nordic states tighten legal and moral pressure. Sweden’s pivot to “Total Defense” further signals Europe’s anxiety over escalating Middle East conflicts and energy instability. With the Strait of Hormuz closed and Russian oil revenues surging, the world faces its worst energy crisis in decades. China’s warning of a looming “World War III” adds urgency. The Nordic move is not just about Netanyahu—it is a stark reminder of how fragile and fractured the global order has become.

🔽


 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2020 Abhijeet Rane

  • What's App
  • Telegram
bottom of page