The Bombay High Court strongly rebuked the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) ...
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- Jul 7
- 3 min read
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
The Bombay High Court strongly rebuked the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) for its failure to secure open manholes, dismissing its progress reports as a mere "eyewash." A division bench of Justices Ajey Gadkari and Kamal Khata questioned the civic body's reactive approach, asking why it consistently waits for fatalities before taking action. The court’s sharp criticism follows the tragic death of 55-year-old Aslam Shaikh, who drowned after falling into an open manhole in Sakinaka during heavy monsoon rains. Emphasizing that human lives are of paramount importance, the bench demanded a guarantee that no more lives would be lost. Consequently, the BMC committed to installing protective grills on all remaining manholes within a week, promising to barricade open sites to ensure public safety.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
A major controversy has erupted at the 2026 FIFA World Cup after US President Donald Trump personally intervened to overturn a red card suspension handed to Team USA star striker Folarin Balogun. Balogun was sent off during a match against Bosnia and Herzegovina, triggering an automatic one-game ban. However, following a phone call from Trump to FIFA President Gianni Infantino, FIFA dramatically rescinded the suspension just before the crucial Round of 16 clash against Belgium. The unprecedented decision has triggered widespread outrage across Europe. The Royal Belgian Football Association expressed sheer astonishment, while UEFA blasted FIFA for crossing a "red line" that compromises the tournament’s integrity. Despite the political intervention to restore their star player, Team USA was ultimately eliminated, losing 4-1 to Belgium
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
The contrast between two recent counter-crime operations exposes the absolute bankruptcy of priorities within India's political opposition and mainstream media. While Uttar Pradesh police arrested eight individuals for theft at the Shri Ram Mandir, Gujarat police simultaneously thwarted a massive terror plot by apprehending eight operatives of the Pakistan-backed Jaish-e-Mohammed.Predictably, opposition leaders from the Congress, Samajwadi Party, and Shiv Sena (UBT)—who historically opposed or trivialized the temple’s construction—have unleashed political hysteria over the theft to attack the symbol of national pride and Hindu unity. Conversely, none of these leaders showed the decency to congratulate the police for averting a horrific terrorist bloodbath. This total lack of geopolitical awareness reveals a dangerous trend: for petty electoral gains, national security is blatantly ignored while trivial matters are weaponized to fracture social cohesion.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
Whether Rahul Gandhi is fit to become India's Prime Minister remains a deeply polarizing debate. Supporters emphasize his extensive political journey, noting his maturing leadership, advocacy for social justice, and efforts to defend democratic institutions through extensive public outreach. They envision him as a collaborative leader offering a vital democratic alternative. Conversely, critics raise sharp concerns over his lack of executive and administrative experience, pointing out that he has never held a ministerial or chief ministerial post. They also question his ability to lead the nation effectively, given the Congress party's significant electoral setbacks under his watch. Ultimately, in India's vibrant democracy, his suitability is not defined by consensus, but by the voters who evaluate his vision, credibility, and capability at the ballot box.
🔽
🖋️ *From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane*
The Delhi High Court’s recent ruling—often mistakenly attributed to the Supreme Court due to social media viral posts—marks a phenomenal, progressive shift in India's family law. By categorically stating that permanent alimony is a measure of social justice and not a tool for personal enrichment, the High Court has dismantled long-standing legal loopholes often prone to misuse. The division bench rightly observed that alimony is meant to prevent destitution, not to forcefully equalize the wealth of two financially capable, independent individuals. This pragmatic judgment injects much-needed fairness and gender neutrality into matrimonial disputes, ensuring that judicial support remains a genuine safety net for vulnerable spouses rather than becoming an unfair financial burden on the other.
🔽
Comments