top of page

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

  • dhadakkamgarunion0
  • Feb 23
  • 3 min read

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

India’s agricultural narrative has often been distorted by selective memory. Past regimes sold wheat at ₹22 per kilo through ration while exporting it at barely half the price. They imported low-quality onions from Pakistan and Iran, only to dump them in pits after public outrage. Meanwhile, traders hoarded onions at ₹160 for a 40‑kg sack, later selling them at ₹40–₹60 per kilo during shortages. These practices thrived under Congress and UPA governments, leaving farmers exploited while middlemen profited. Today, the same voices accuse the Modi government of “surrendering” to America, shedding false tears over dairy and farm trade. The truth is, no U.S. trade deal has been finalized yet—it will take 8–12 months at least. Citizens must keep their memory strong and resist being misled by orchestrated fake news campaigns.

đź”˝

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

On the final day of the budget session, Raja Bhaiya struck a chord that deserves recognition. He welcomed the allocation of ₹2,000 crore for minorities and madrasas, acknowledging the importance of inclusive education. Yet, he raised a crucial point: the neglect of Sanskrit, a language that carries the soul of India’s cultural and intellectual heritage. His words—“Sanskrit is dying, it needs a dedicated fund”—were not mere rhetoric but a reminder of our responsibility to preserve what connects us to centuries of wisdom. While modern priorities demand attention, the erosion of Sanskrit reflects a deeper cultural loss. A balanced budget should not only uplift marginalized communities but also safeguard traditions that define our identity. Raja Bhaiya’s appeal is both timely and necessary, urging policymakers to act before Sanskrit fades into silence.

đź”˝

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

The glorification of Tipu Sultan is not a recent phenomenon but a carefully orchestrated effort by the Left–Congress ecosystem over decades. From Girish Karnad’s plays to Sanjay Khan’s television series, the attempt has been to project Tipu as a liberal and benevolent ruler, embedding this image into public consciousness. Yet, historical evidence paints a different picture—Tipu was ruthless, driven by a jihadi mindset, and far from the romanticized figure often portrayed. Journalist Kiran D. Tare, through his incisive article, has courageously dismantled this narrative with proof, exposing both Tipu’s actions and the ecosystem’s deliberate distortion. In an era where few media voices dare to challenge entrenched myths, Tare and The Perfect Voice deserve genuine appreciation. Their work is a reminder that truth must prevail over propaganda.

đź”˝

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

The White House has clarified that India’s tariff rate has been reduced from 18% to 10% under Trump’s new “global tariff” policy. This marks yet another turn in a long journey: tariffs once moved from 0% to 25%, then 50%, later down to 18%, and now 10%. The cycle suggests that trade negotiations are fluid, often returning to where they began. An interim Indian delegation is set to visit the U.S. this week, with a final agreement expected within 8–12 months. Despite loud claims of surrender or crisis, the reality is that no American trade deal has been finalized yet. Citizens must resist fake news hysteria and recognize that tariffs are tools of negotiation, not permanent verdicts. In this shifting landscape, patience and clarity matter more than panic.

đź”˝

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

Ashok Chavan’s move to the BJP seemed to signal that Congress had shed its Hindutva leanings, leaving only secular remnants behind. Yet reality proved otherwise. A letter from Nanded Congress leader Balaji Chavan to the state president openly demanded that a Hindu representative be appointed, since no Hindu corporator was elected in the municipal corporation. The contradiction is glaring: votes are sought from Muslims, but representation is claimed only for Hindus. Historically too, Congress has played majoritarian politics—rejecting Jinnah’s united India proposal, excluding Dalit Muslims from SC reservations, reserving Muslim-majority seats for SC-ST, and enacting the Enemy Property Act to seize assets. These actions reveal that Hindutva has always been central to Congress’s politics. The question remains: why maintain the façade of secularism when the core is otherwise?

đź”˝






 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2020 Abhijeet Rane

  • What's App
  • Telegram
bottom of page