🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- May 4
- 4 min read
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The 50 per cent cap on caste-based reservations in India, though not mandated by the Constitution, has evolved through a series of Supreme Court judgments—most notably the 1992 Indra Sawhney verdict. This legal precedent aimed to strike a balance between affirmative action and the principle of equality. However, with growing demands for better representation of OBCs, SCs, and STs—particularly in light of new caste census efforts—this cap is now being challenged as a hindrance to social justice. Rahul Gandhi's renewed call to scrap the 50 per cent limit reflects this shift, arguing that the ceiling blocks meaningful upliftment of marginalized communities.The recent announcement of caste enumeration in the upcoming census marks a significant policy change by the Centre, potentially laying the groundwork for future legal challenges to the cap. While some states like Tamil Nadu have already implemented quotas exceeding the 50 per cent limit through legislative means, the broader national framework remains constrained unless backed by empirical data and constitutional amendments. Any serious move to breach this ceiling would likely involve fresh litigation and judicial scrutiny, reopening a long-standing debate over the scope and purpose of reservations in India.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw's emphasis on the need for a global framework to regulate AI highlights India’s proactive approach in aligning with international standards for ethical AI use. The Wave Conference becomes a symbol of India’s ambition to be a global thought leader in technology policy, especially as the country rapidly adopts AI across sectors. The key message revolves around not just adoption, but responsible and well-guided implementation through consensus and cooperation.In addition to tech policy, the page also showcases India's expanding economic footprint with a major ₹8,000 crore deal in the Vedanta ecosystem, reflecting strong industrial momentum. Culturally, the entertainment and political scenes continue to evolve—whether it's new faces in Indian cinema or political controversies involving ministers. The blend of governance, technology, economy, and social trends shows a nation that is navigating modernization while dealing with grassroots challenges. This balance of ambition and reality defines India’s current narrative.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
A striking imbalance in the distribution of cinema screens across India, with over 10,000 of the country’s 20,000 theatres concentrated in South India. This disproportion is linked to the region’s consistent investment in film infrastructure, higher footfall, and thriving local cinema culture. In contrast, North India—despite a vast Hindi-speaking population and a strong film industry—lags behind in screen count, which is hampering theatrical reach and limiting potential revenue. Aamir Khan, speaking at an event, emphasized this as a major hurdle in expanding India’s film industry and called for strategic action to build more theatres in underserved regions.This trend reflects deeper infrastructural and cultural divides within the country. South India’s dominance in cinema infrastructure has allowed it to cultivate strong regional industries, while in the North, rapid urban development and high land costs may have discouraged theatre expansion. Aamir’s remarks suggest that for the Hindi film industry to sustain and grow, it must resolve this gap—especially as digital platforms continue to alter consumption patterns. He suggests learning from South India’s successful models, including local collaborations and long-term planning. Bridging this divide is essential for balanced entertainment access and industry-wide growth.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
On the recent Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, where the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has traced the mastermind to Pakistan. According to the NIA’s findings, terror outfits Lashkar-e-Taiba, ISI, and elements of the Pakistani Army were involved in orchestrating the attack, which led to the deaths of eight terrorists and the neutralization of four terror hideouts. With the help of over 20 drone missions and 2,800 civilian interviews, Indian forces were able to gather vital intelligence that exposed cross-border involvement. The use of modern surveillance, such as CCTV and drone technology, has been crucial in mapping out the network behind the attacks.India's response to the incident has been firm, with officials like J.D. Blass stating that the country will retaliate strongly to any attempt to destabilize its sovereignty. There is also mounting pressure on the global community to hold Pakistan accountable, as India demands clarity from its allies regarding their stance on terrorism and diplomatic support. Meanwhile, the Indian government has banned YouTube channels linked to Pakistani figures like Sharif and intensified efforts to dismantle online terror propaganda. The article presents a clear picture of India’s resolve to eliminate terrorism at its roots while urging the international community to isolate nations that harbor or export terrorism.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The inflammatory remarks by retired Bangladeshi Major General ALM Fazlur Rahman are reckless, irresponsible, and dangerously delusional. His suggestion that Bangladesh should invade and occupy India’s northeastern states in the event of an India-Pakistan conflict is not only a blatant threat to regional peace but also exposes a deeply flawed understanding of geopolitical realities. Encouraging military collaboration with China to execute such an absurd idea reflects a disturbing alignment with hostile forces and a complete disregard for international diplomacy and sovereignty. Rahman's comments only succeed in tarnishing Bangladesh’s image and risk undoing years of cooperative efforts between New Delhi and Dhaka.Even more appalling is Muhammad Yunus’s audacious claim that Bangladesh is the "only guardian of the ocean" and that India's Northeast is somehow an economic opportunity for China. Such statements are thinly veiled threats masked as economic commentary and undermine India’s sovereignty. India’s dignified yet firm response, through external affairs minister S. Jaishankar and policy shifts like terminating cargo trans-shipment arrangements, sends a clear message: India will not tolerate strategic provocations or backdoor threats from neighbors attempting to play proxies for Chinese expansionism. The Northeast is not up for negotiation—it is a vibrant, connected, and inseparable part of India.
🔽
Comments