🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- Jul 28
- 4 min read
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The recent revelation that over 26.34 lakh people were deemed ineligible for the Ladki Bahin Yojana is a matter of serious concern, highlighting both systemic lapses and the urgent need for stringent verification. While the scheme was introduced with the noble intent of empowering women and offering financial assistance, misuse by ineligible applicants undermines its core objective and deprives deserving women of timely support. The efforts by the Chief Minister’s Office and Minister Aditi Tatkare to bring transparency to this process are commendable, but the very need for such filtering suggests a deeper administrative flaw that must be addressed.Going forward, the government must establish a robust mechanism to verify eligibility before benefits are disbursed. Technology-led data verification, linking with Aadhaar and income tax records, and coordination between departments can help reduce such large-scale discrepancies. More importantly, penal action must be taken against those who willfully exploited the system to send a strong message. A scheme like Ladki Bahin Yojana can transform lives, but only if it's implemented with accountability and strict oversight. Aditi Tatkare’s insistence on corrective measures offers hope, but its execution will determine the real success of the scheme.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
China's construction of a new dam on the Brahmaputra River poses not just an ecological threat but a strategic challenge to India. The aggressive expansionist mindset of China is reflected in its frequent encroachments on land, and now, with its control over water resources, it threatens to weaponize water as a geopolitical tool. The Brahmaputra is a critical river for India's northeastern states, especially Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, and tampering with its natural flow could destabilize the region's agriculture, ecology, and civilian life. Such unilateral actions by China ignore established water-sharing agreements and reflect its broader intent of maintaining dominance over critical regional lifelines.India must treat this issue with utmost seriousness—not just as an environmental concern but as a national security challenge. Diplomatic engagement alone won’t suffice. India must expedite hydrological surveillance, build strategic dams on its side of the river, and establish robust regional alliances to counterbalance Chinese moves. Furthermore, India should raise the issue at global environmental and human rights platforms, highlighting the risks of China's water aggression to downstream populations. In an era where water could spark future conflicts, India's preparedness and assertive diplomacy will determine whether it is a passive observer or a resilient power in Asia’s geopolitical chessboard.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The image of Raj Thackeray stepping into ‘Matoshree’ to wish Uddhav Thackeray on his birthday after years of silence has reignited the discussion of a potential reunion between the estranged Thackeray cousins. This symbolic gesture, marked by warmth and emotion, is more than just a birthday visit—it is a possible political signal amidst Maharashtra’s shifting dynamics.Such a coalition could rejuvenate the traditional Marathi voter base and bring together two charismatic leaders whose split had fragmented Shiv Sena's core support years ago.Yet, this potential alliance is not without complexities. While the Thackeray legacy remains a uniting factor, differences in ideology, past bitterness, and conflicting ambitions still loom large. Uddhav’s recent political trajectory is grounded in a broader alliance with secular parties, whereas Raj has often leaned toward a nationalist tone. For any realignment to succeed, it must go beyond family sentiment and address deep political and ideological recalibration. If they manage to bridge these gaps, this reunion could shake up the balance of power in Maharashtra—especially in BMC elections where Marathi identity, emotional appeal, and organizational strength are crucial. This might just be the beginning of a bigger saffron resurgence from the heart of Maharashtra’s political legacy.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The tragic floods that devastated Mumbai on July 26, 2005, resulting in the loss of 1,044 lives, should have served as a turning point in the city’s urban planning and disaster management policies. However, twenty years later, the situation remains worryingly unchanged. Encroachments, improper drainage, mindless concretization, and poor waste management continue to choke Mumbai's natural water routes. Despite countless promises by successive governments, the city’s infrastructure remains ill-equipped to handle even moderate rainfall. The lack of long-term vision, combined with short-sighted governance and greed-driven urban development, has led to a recurring annual crisis.Mumbai’s resilience has become a popular narrative, but it is high time that we stop glorifying survival and start demanding accountability. What has been done in the name of development has systematically dismantled the city’s natural defenses. The memories of the 2005 deluge are fresh in the hearts of Mumbaikars, yet the lessons seem to have been forgotten by those in power. We must shift from emotional appeals to actionable policies that preserve what remains of our ecology and prepare us for the changing climate. This is not just about remembering the past but about safeguarding the city’s future — one that should not be built on the ruins of neglect.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The recent raid on a drug party in Pune, which led to the arrest of Pranjal Khewalkar—son-in-law of former minister Eknath Khadse—has brought political embarrassment and sparked public outrage. The police operation uncovered narcotics, alcohol, and party paraphernalia, raising serious questions about the conduct of individuals linked to political families. While the action was swift, the presence of Khewalkar has made this more than a routine crime story. It reflects how the misuse of privilege can lead to repeated violations of law, and the system must ensure accountability regardless of political affiliations.Former minister Eknath Khadse’s reaction calling it a "private matter" is seen as an attempt to downplay the seriousness of the incident. However, the public sentiment is clear—political connections should not be used as a shield against justice. The entire episode also fuels the narrative that many high-profile individuals believe they are untouchable, even in the face of clear legal violations. This incident must be a wake-up call, not just for law enforcement, but also for political parties to introspect and set examples that demonstrate zero tolerance towards such actions, especially when associated with their own circles.
🔽
Comments