top of page

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

  • dhadakkamgarunion0
  • Oct 7
  • 3 min read

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

Trump’s Race for Peace—and the Nobel Prize? With the Nobel announcements underway, US President Donald Trump has turned up the heat on Hamas and Israel to finalize his 20-point Gaza peace plan. “Hurry up,” he quipped, as the Nobel Prize for Medicine was declared—hinting, perhaps, at his own aspirations for the Peace Prize. Trump’s proposal includes a phased Israeli withdrawal, hostage exchanges, and a transitional governance model for Gaza. Hamas has conditionally agreed, while Israel remains cautious. Trump insists all Arab nations are on board, and only Hamas’s signature remains. Critics call it theatrical; supporters hail it as historic. Either way, Trump’s timing is impeccable—and his messaging unmistakable. In the age of diplomacy by deadline, this might be the first peace deal negotiated with one eye on Oslo. Whether it’s genuine statesmanship or strategic showmanship, Trump’s bid for peace is now racing the Nobel clock.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane,

Adani’s Silence Is Strength—But Was Mercy a Mistake? After facing defamation complaints from the Adani Group, journalists Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar reportedly visited Ahmedabad to personally apologize to Gautam Adani. Sources suggest they deleted all social media content targeting Adani and pledged never to comment on him again. The trigger? A court notice that hinted at asset seizure and trial under new defamation laws. While Adani’s restraint is being praised, some critics argue he repeated the mistake of historical figures—like Prithviraj Chauhan forgiving Ghori, or Jaitley and Gadkari sparing Kejriwal. In an age of weaponized narratives, mercy can be misread as weakness. Adani’s decision to document the apology may serve as a future deterrent, but the episode raises a deeper question: should truth be defended with quiet dignity, or with uncompromising resolve? Either way, the message is clear—baseless attacks now carry real consequences.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

When Democracy Bleeds in Bengal, Silence Screams ! In West Bengal’s flood-hit Jalpaiguri, BJP MP Khagen Murmu—a tribal leader from Malda—was brutally attacked during relief work. Stones, rods, and slogans rained down as his convoy was ambushed, leaving him bloodied and hospitalized. The attackers? Allegedly TMC-linked goons. Yet, the usual chorus of “democracy in danger”—activists, award-returning intellectuals, and primetime panelists—remains eerily silent. When a sitting MP is assaulted for helping citizens, where is the outrage? For decades, communist regimes in Bengal nurtured illegal infiltrators; now Mamata Banerjee’s vote-bank politics continues that legacy, emboldening violent mobs. If this is the fate of elected representatives, imagine the plight of ordinary citizens. Democracy isn’t just threatened—it’s bleeding in broad daylight. And those who claim to defend it seem to have lost their voice when it matters most.

🔽

From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane, by

Chidambaram’s Mumbai Attack Remark: Congress Cornered Again!Congress leader P. Chidambaram’s recent statement on the 26/11 Mumbai attacks has reignited controversy. By suggesting that the UPA government responded too “mildly” compared to how the U.S. would have reacted, Chidambaram has inadvertently cast doubt on his own party’s national security stance. The remark aligns awkwardly with Rahul Gandhi’s earlier claim that a Congress leader had prior knowledge of the attack’s mastermind. Together, these statements hint at a troubling narrative: that intelligence was ignored, and accountability evaded. As demands grow to reveal the identity of the informed leader, Congress faces renewed pressure. Critics argue this isn’t just a lapse—it’s a legacy of negligence. With national security back in the spotlight, the party’s silence may prove costlier than its past decisions. The question now is whether Congress can contain the damage—or if the truth will unravel further.

🔽

🖋️ From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane

Rahul Gandhi’s Foreign Trail: Coincidence or Calculated Moves? Rahul Gandhi’s recent Malaysia visit has stirred speculation, especially after reports of a closed-door meeting with controversial preacher Zakir Naik and George Soros’s son. The timing coincides with unrest in Ladakh, where over 250 suspected agitators—including Nepalese and Doda-based elements—were detained. Meanwhile, “I Love Mohammad” protest banners have surfaced in Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, raising eyebrows. Now, Rahul heads to Colombia—a known hub for narco-finance and deep-state currency flows. Analysts suggest this leg may be linked to funding logistics for upcoming global engagements. His Brazil and Chile visits appear ceremonial, but whispers of covert CIA meetings persist. As Modi’s governance tightens its grip, many believe the countdown has begun. If the alleged nexus unfolds further, Rahul may find the world too small to run. The question remains: are these travels diplomatic, or part of a deeper, disruptive design?

🔽

ree
ree
ree
ree
ree
ree

 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2020 Abhijeet Rane

  • What's App
  • Telegram
bottom of page