From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- Aug 24
- 3 min read
From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
Hypocrisy in the Name of Democracy. Sharad Pawar’s NCP (SP) has recently accused the Election Commission of enabling vote theft through bogus entries and duplicate voter names. Ironically, the same party once encouraged unethical voting practices—Pawar himself allegedly urged voters in 2014 to cast ballots twice, once in Mumbai and again in Satara. Such past actions cast a long shadow over current claims. Despite decades in politics, the party seems to ignore basic safeguards like indelible ink and voter ID verification, which make multiple voting nearly impossible. No concrete data—no fake voter IDs, no booth-level evidence—has been presented. Other major parties haven’t echoed these allegations either. Instead of exposing the Election Commission, these accusations expose the accusers. Baseless claims only erode public trust and reveal a deeper desperation. Democracy deserves vigilance, not theatrics. The people are watching—and remembering.
From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
When Power Overwhelms Humanity. In a shocking incident during a Congress rally in Bihar, a police officer was reportedly run over by Rahul Gandhi’s vehicle. Eyewitnesses claim the officer lay injured while bystanders pleaded with the driver to stop. What followed was even more disturbing—Rahul Gandhi allegedly remained seated, neither stepping out to help nor acknowledging the gravity of the moment. The rally continued, as if a human life beneath the wheels was a mere inconvenience. Such indifference from a national leader raises serious questions about empathy and accountability. Leadership demands not just slogans, but compassion. When a man is crushed under your convoy and you choose silence over action, it’s not just arrogance—it’s inhuman. India deserves leaders who see people not as props, but as lives worth protecting.
From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
The Wall and the World Beyond. A viral message, falsely attributed to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, has stirred global attention. In it, she allegedly rebukes Donald Trump’s border wall policy, warning that beyond the wall stand 7 billion consumers ready to reject American products—from iPhones to Nike shoes. The statement, though powerful, is not official. Fact-checkers confirm Sheinbaum never made such remarks. Still, the sentiment resonates. It reflects growing frustration with protectionist policies and the illusion of American indispensability. The world today is interconnected, and economic retaliation is no longer a fantasy—it’s a strategic possibility. Whether real or imagined, the message underscores a truth: global consumers have choices, and political arrogance can isolate rather than empower. The wall, symbolic or literal, may not protect—it may simply divide.
From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
Russia’s Oil Discount—A Strategic Lifeline for India. Russia’s 5% discount on crude oil to India has sent ripples across global media, signalling more than just economic relief. Amid rising tensions from U.S. tariffs under Donald Trump, this gesture underscores Moscow’s trust in India as a long-term energy partner. With oil prices hovering near $60 per barrel, India’s access to Russian crude at $56–57 offers a buffer against inflation and geopolitical shocks. Contrary to Western claims that only elite corporations’ benefit, data shows Indian public sector units like IOC and BPCL are major buyers, stabilizing domestic fuel costs. As U.S. sanctions strain bilateral ties, Russia’s move is both a commercial and geopolitical message—reinforcing India’s autonomy in global trade. In an era of shifting alliances, this discount isn’t just about barrels—it’s about balance. India must now counter hostile narratives with facts, lest propaganda rewrite reality.
From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane
A Strategic Shift in Parliamentary Tactics. In a dramatic turn during the recent Parliament session, Union Home Minister Amit Shah faced paper missiles and chaos while tabling three contentious bills. Yet, the real story lies in BJP’s tactical pivot. Traditionally, bills were introduced after mutual agreement between ruling and opposition parties, ensuring orderly debate. However, BJP broke this pattern—Shah presented the bills from the third row, minimizing disruption, and the government reversed the speaking order, choosing to speak before the opposition. This shift caught Congress off guard, denying them their usual strategy of creating uproar post-speech. Despite attempts by leaders like Venugopal and Owaisi to intervene, the opposition faltered. BJP’s manoeuvring not only ensured the bills reached the Joint Parliamentary Committee but also exposed the limitations of opposition theatrics. It marks a new phase in legislative strategy—one that prioritizes control over spectacle.
Comments