top of page

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

  • dhadakkamgarunion0
  • Aug 14
  • 7 min read

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

Some treaties preserve peace; others preserve the past. Knowing when to part with them is a test of leadership. The International Court of Justice’s call for India to reinstate the Indus Water Treaty has reignited debate on the balance between international commitments and national interests. India’s refusal signals a clear message: treaties that no longer reflect present realities cannot be binding in perpetuity. Conceived in 1960 under very different geopolitical and environmental circumstances, the treaty now constrains India’s water security amid population growth, climate stress, and repeated diplomatic hostilities from Pakistan. Critics argue that unilateral refusal undermines India’s image as a rules-based power. Yet sovereignty includes the right to renegotiate outdated arrangements. The challenge is ensuring that India’s stand strengthens its strategic posture without alienating partners who value multilateral dispute resolution.

🔽

From The Desk of Abhijeet Rane,

When vision meets execution, offices become launchpads—and today, Maharashtra just lit the fuse for its next digital leap. In a significant step towards positioning Maharashtra as a frontrunner in India’s digital transformation, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis inaugurated IBM’s new office in Mumbai—aptly named “The Gateway to Viksit Bharat.” On this occasion, the State’s IT Department and IBM India Pvt. Ltd. signed a Letter of Intent to advance Maharashtra’s Quantum Mission and strategic initiatives. The move signals a deep partnership between global tech expertise and the State’s vision for a digitally empowered economy. CM Fadnavis affirmed that as India’s economy surges ahead at record pace, Maharashtra is equally poised to fulfill its Viksit Maharashtra dream—with IBM’s collaboration playing a pivotal role. This development is more than infrastructure—it’s a roadmap for talent, innovation, and global competitiveness.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

Nations built only to sell or only to buy sway with the storm; nations that can do both stand like a tree with roots in every season. When the U.S. extended tariff relief to China for 90 days, citing Christmas shopping, it revealed a stark truth—America is primarily a consumer, not a producer. Delaying tariffs ensures Chinese goods arrive tariff-free in August, September, and October, keeping shelves stocked and inflation at bay. But this dependency exposes a structural weakness: in times of pandemic, war, or recession, such economies struggle. China, in contrast, is a producer without matching domestic consumption strength. India’s resilience lies in being both—a producer and a buyer. Our domestic supply chains feed our own markets, while exports tap global demand. Add to this our cultural habit of saving and investing in gold, and India emerges as a unique buffer against global turbulence.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

In a republic, rules are meant to protect the people from power—not to protect power from the rules. The timeline is clear—and troubling. Antonia Maino married Rajiv Gandhi in 1968, but only acquired Indian citizenship in 1983. Yet she lived in the Prime Minister’s residence for years as a foreign national. More troubling is the record that in 1980—three years before naturalization—she appeared on India’s electoral rolls and allegedly voted. How did this happen under a constitutional system that explicitly bars non-citizens from voting? Was it administrative oversight, political influence, or deliberate circumvention? These are not minor procedural queries; they go to the heart of electoral integrity. India’s democracy rests on the sanctity of its voter lists. When exceptions appear for the politically powerful, it erodes public faith and sets a dangerous precedent.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

When nations start calling back their gold, it’s not just metal moving—it’s the tectonic plates of trust shifting under the global economy.The sudden decision by Germany, Spain, and France to withdraw gold and deposits from the U.S. Federal Reserve—ironically a privately owned bank—has sent ripples through the global financial system. Such moves are rarely about logistics; they are calculated signals of mistrust or shifting power equations. The abrupt deployment of National Guards in Washington, D.C. only adds to speculation about the scale of uncertainty. For decades, the Federal Reserve’s vaults have been the world’s financial safety deposit box, symbolizing stability. Today, that symbolism appears under strain. Whether driven by geopolitical tensions, fears of asset freezes, or preparation for a new monetary order, this coordinated withdrawal is a reminder that even the most entrenched systems can face crisis.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

This situation in Mantralaya reflects a deep-rooted problem of entitlement and disregard for public spaces by those in positions of power. When ministers or senior officials encroach upon common areas meant for citizens or administrative purposes, it sends a wrong message — that governance is about personal convenience rather than public service. Such actions erode the principle of equal access and respect for shared infrastructure, creating an atmosphere where rules apply selectively. The fact that this is happening in the very heart of state administration is alarming, as it undermines the credibility of leadership and governance ethics.Beyond the optics, this is also about operational efficiency. When common spaces are blocked for personal use, it hampers movement, restricts access for the public and junior staff, and affects day-to-day work. This form of occupation is not just a matter of ethics, but of functionality — a government office must remain an open, accessible, and disciplined workspace. Addressing such issues requires not just removing these encroachments but also setting strict precedents so that misuse of space and authority is neither tolerated nor repeated. Ultimately, public trust depends on how seriously leaders hold themselves accountable to the same rules they expect citizens to follow.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

The persistent menace of stray dogs has now crossed the limits of public patience. Despite repeated court directives, established protocols, and available methods for sterilization and population control, municipal bodies have failed to deliver results. The issue is no longer about the absence of solutions—it’s about the absence of will and accountability. Citizens are justified in demanding that authorities be held responsible, as the inaction is leading to recurring dog bite incidents, fear in neighborhoods, and an overall compromise on public safety. At this point, legal and disciplinary action against negligent officials is not just warranted—it’s overdue.The conversation around animal rights and public safety needs balance, but this balance cannot be achieved by ignoring the plight of ordinary people. While humane methods must be followed, they must also be implemented with urgency, transparency, and measurable outcomes. Every court order ignored, every sterilization program left incomplete, and every incident brushed aside chips away at public trust. The time has come for a performance-based approach—where municipal officers are judged by results, not paperwork—and where citizens’ safety stands at the core of policy execution.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

The Bombay High Court has reprimanded the Mumbai Municipal Corporation for its unilateral and impractical decision to enforce a permanent ban on pigeon feeding. The court pointed out that while public health is important, religious sentiments and traditions must also be respected. The matter of balancing citizens’ health concerns with faith-based practices has been referred to a special 11-member committee for review. The court’s strong remarks underline that civic bodies cannot impose blanket bans without considering constitutional rights and public consultation, especially when such issues touch upon religious customs.This incident highlights the classic governance challenge of reconciling public health policy with cultural and religious freedoms. Pigeons, while a source of certain health risks, are also part of long-standing community traditions. The High Court’s intervention makes it clear that a nuanced, consultative, and evidence-backed approach is essential rather than an abrupt prohibition. Moving forward, the municipal authorities will have to frame regulations that minimize health hazards without disregarding religious practices—possibly through controlled feeding zones, public awareness campaigns, and stricter cleanliness measures. This balanced strategy could prevent further public backlash and legal challenges.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

The Supreme Court’s observation that an electoral roll cannot remain fixed indefinitely, and that periodic review is essential, strikes at the heart of a healthy democracy. Voter lists are living documents — they need to evolve with population shifts, migrations, and the inevitable changes in voter eligibility. The court’s emphasis on the need for re-verification ensures that electoral processes remain transparent, inclusive, and accurate. By setting the cap of 11 documents for verification, the ruling also addresses concerns about bureaucratic hurdles, ensuring no voter is disenfranchised merely due to administrative rigidity. This strikes a balance between preventing fraudulent entries and protecting genuine voter rights.However, this judgment also exposes a deeper challenge for the Election Commission and state administrations — the need to maintain voter lists with both speed and integrity. While continuous revision prevents electoral malpractice, it also demands resources, trained manpower, and a robust grievance redressal system for those wrongfully excluded. In politically volatile states, where voter roll manipulation has been alleged in the past, the Supreme Court’s clarity could serve as a strong safeguard. But the real test lies in the execution — whether governments will act proactively to clean and update rolls, or let them stagnate until another legal nudge forces action. This ruling is not just legal guidance; it’s a reminder that democracy thrives when its foundation — the voter list — is alive and trustworthy.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:

Pakistan’s latest threat over the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty once again exposes its habitual double standards and obsession with provocation. By attempting to frame India’s water management decisions as an act of aggression, Pakistani leadership is trying to stir nationalist sentiment at home and divert attention from its own internal failures. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s statement about teaching India a “lesson never to be forgotten” is not only diplomatically irresponsible but also an admission that Pakistan prefers rhetoric and intimidation over dialogue and cooperation. This constant saber-rattling shows that Islamabad’s leadership continues to exploit anti-India narratives to maintain political relevance.India, on the other hand, has maintained a measured stance, emphasizing that any treaty-based disagreements should be addressed within legal and diplomatic frameworks. The Indus Waters Treaty, brokered in 1960 with World Bank mediation, has survived wars and conflicts, largely because India has abided by its obligations. Pakistan’s threat to escalate over water issues, especially when coupled with its ongoing support for cross-border terrorism, only strengthens India’s case in the international arena. Rather than succumbing to Pakistan’s theatrics, India must stay firm, reinforce its water management rights under the treaty, and expose Pakistan’s pattern of hostility before global forums.

🔽

🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane

Respected Shri Deven Bharati Ji,

Commissioner of Police

Mumbai

Warm greetings on your birthday!

Your distinguished service, leadership, and unwavering dedication to the safety of Mumbai inspire us all.

You have upheld the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in policing.

Your proactive initiatives and strategic vision have strengthened public trust.

From tackling complex challenges to ensuring citizens’ security, your commitment is exemplary.

Your humane approach and accessibility make you a people’s officer.

May your life be blessed with health, happiness, and continued success.

We are proud to have you leading Mumbai Police with such honor.

Happy Birthday and best wishes always!

-Abhijeet Rane

🔽

 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2020 Abhijeet Rane

  • What's App
  • Telegram
bottom of page