🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- Aug 3
- 4 min read
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
At a time when the global stage is riddled with economic insecurities, India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has chosen self-reliance over dependence, resolve over submission. Trump's unnecessary and misinformed comments about India's so-called "dead economy" deserve to be met with the same disregard with which we treat obsolete opinions. Instead, Modi’s call to the nation—that we must stand behind the very products that Indian hands, sweat, and ingenuity have created—is not just patriotic sentiment, it is sound economic strategy. Buying Indian isn’t just nationalism; it’s economic survival in a world hell-bent on trade wars and protectionism.It is heartening to see India confidently asserting its place as the third-largest economy in the world, not through borrowed capital or debt traps, but through the spirit of entrepreneurship, innovation, and resilience. Be it the technological advancements of ISRO, the precision strikes of Operation Sindhoor, or the massive infrastructural push across sectors, we are witnessing a rising India powered by its own people. The opposition must stop questioning every strategic move and instead join in fostering a national mood of progress and dignity. Buying local, backing local, and being vocal about it is how we transform patriotic intention into tangible economic power.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
What we are witnessing between Raj Thackeray and Devendra Fadnavis is not merely a war of words, but a deeper ideological battle about the nature of protest, governance, and linguistic identity in Maharashtra. Raj Thackeray’s challenge to “get arrested and show the guts” is a strategic attempt to provoke the state into overreaction while portraying himself as a fearless voice of dissent. But Fadnavis’ response is equally precise—he's made it clear that while protests are acceptable in democracy, Urban Naxalite-style chaos will not be tolerated. The message is sharp: uphold your cause with dignity, or be ready to face consequences if it turns anarchic.This clash isn’t just political—it touches the nerve of Marathi pride and public order. While Raj is positioning himself as the defender of Marathi culture and local sentiment, Fadnavis is drawing a red line where agitation must not become disruption. The public discourse is shifting—from emotional appeals to structural scrutiny. Both leaders know their audience well, but it’s the common citizen who must decode who truly offers progress and who merely offers provocation. In a state like Maharashtra, which stands at the crossroads of industrial growth and cultural assertion, such debates must elevate solutions—not just noise.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
Donald Trump’s tariff war is nothing but a desperate chess move made by a man who thinks diplomacy is a boardroom deal. Announcing a 25% tariff on Indian imports and pretending it’s about protecting American interests is laughable when the real intention is to bully emerging economies. What Trump fails to acknowledge is that India is no longer the silent participant in global economics. India under Prime Minister Narendra Modi is playing its own game, with strategic alliances, manufacturing growth, and Atmanirbhar Bharat at its core. If Trump thinks tariffs can shake India’s foundation, he is grossly miscalculating the resilience and depth of our economy.While Trump plays tit-for-tat economics, India has a clear long-term vision. We're not only investing in local manufacturing but also positioning ourselves as a strong alternative to Chinese supply chains. The U.S. trying to arm-wrestle India may have temporary headline value, but in the long game, it’s India that’s quietly turning pawns into queens. It’s time the global community saw through this tariff drama and recognized it as political noise ahead of an American election year. India’s maturity lies in not reacting impulsively, but recalibrating the global trade balance—with calm strategy, not loud threats.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
Once again, Rahul Gandhi has resorted to his favourite political pastime—attacking Indian institutions without a shred of credible proof. His latest statement branding the Indian election system as "dead" and claiming electoral fraud reeks of habitual victimhood and selective memory. Rather than acknowledging the repeated mandates the people of India have given the current government, he blames the Election Commission, the judiciary, and even the voters, if necessary. This pattern of disrespect toward institutions only highlights the opposition's desperation and lack of political substance. Rahul's outdated rants no longer stir the public but only serve as comic relief in today’s political theatre.Moreover, invoking the late Arun Jaitley and trying to portray himself as some kind of rebel hero threatened by the establishment is both distasteful and untruthful. Jaitley was a statesman who believed in the rule of law, not empty noise. Rahul Gandhi’s allegations fall apart when examined closely—he ignores the massive public support that led to BJP victories and offers no alternative vision for the country. In the age of real-time scrutiny, social media, and massive public participation, such cries of “election fraud” without evidence only insult the intelligence of Indian voters. It's time he introspected rather than constantly peddling conspiracy theories.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The Uddhav Thackeray faction invoking Chief Justice B.R. Gavai’s own words—“do what you said”—is not just a legal plea, it's a well-scripted political performance aimed at spotlighting the so-called 'gaddar' MLAs. While they demand urgency from the judiciary, it’s hard to ignore the theatrics behind it. Where was this fire when discontent was brewing internally? Instead of introspecting why nearly 40 MLAs chose to rebel, the Thackeray camp continues to play the victim card, using the court's words as political ammunition.Let’s be honest—judiciary doesn’t move on emotional appeals or street protests; it moves on procedure, evidence, and law. Selective outrage over delay doesn’t help when your own house was divided. The message is clear: Shiv Sena (UBT) wants legal endorsement for a political loss. They want disqualification to be their redemption arc. But no amount of slogans or banners can cover up internal leadership failures. The real issue isn’t whether the court will act—it's whether Uddhav Thackeray will finally confront the rebellion that started under his watch.
🔽
Comments