🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
- dhadakkamgarunion0
- Apr 20
- 4 min read
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
Raj Thackeray is the only political leader in Maharashtra who has dared to speak up fearlessly against the forced imposition of Hindi in state schools. While the government slyly hides behind the veil of “national integration,” what they’re truly doing is launching a direct attack on Maharashtra’s identity. Hindi is not the national language—it is just one of many languages in this diverse nation. Then why is it being forced on Marathi students from Class 1? This is not education reform; it’s linguistic bullying.
What’s shocking is the silence of other so-called Marathi leaders. Where is their voice when the very soul of Maharashtra—its language—is being challenged? Are they too scared to lose favour with Delhi? Raj is right to call this out for what it is: an attempt to divide, distract, and rule. When there are far more pressing issues—unemployment, farmers’ distress, and industrial decline—why is the government playing with the cultural fabric of the state? This is not just about a language. This is about self-respect. And if the rest won’t speak, the people of Maharashtra must rise with Raj and say loud and clear: “We are Hindus, but we are not Hindi.”
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The Waqf Amendment Bill seemed like a bold move—finally challenging decades of unchecked control and bringing in reforms that many had long demanded. Removing the "Waqf by user" clause and pushing for more accountability was the right step. But now, with the matter in the Supreme Court, the question that must be asked is—was Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government completely unaware of the legal and social firestorm this would ignite?
This isn’t a minor policy tweak. This is a direct intervention in a sensitive religious structure. Did Modi sign off on this without assessing the constitutional ramifications? Or was this part of a larger political gamble? The silence from the PM on the matter now, while the issue is being legally challenged, is both shocking and telling.When you push for reform, you better be prepared for the pushback. If the PM was truly unaware, it reflects a serious lapse in governance. If he was aware and still let this go forward without preparing the nation, the courts, or even his own party for the consequences—then that’s political recklessness. Either way, the government must now face not just the Supreme Court, but also the court of public opinion.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The recent remarks by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar are a sharp reminder of the growing tension between the judiciary and the executive. When the Supreme Court dictates deadlines to the President of India—who is the highest constitutional authority—it doesn’t just set a precedent; it disturbs the foundational balance of powers enshrined in our Constitution. Is this judiciary's job—to time the President? Absolutely not.Dhankhar rightly called it out: the President is not a clerk to be given deadlines. This is not just about procedures—this is about respect for constitutional offices. The judiciary stepping into the shoes of the executive and issuing directives like it’s running a school weakens democracy, not strengthens it. Are we now heading toward judicial overreach in the name of activism?The President and Governors already act on the advice of elected governments. If delays occur, it's a political issue, not one for the courts to fix by deadlines. Instead of playing referee, the Supreme Court must ask itself—is it protecting the Constitution or bending it for optics? This incident raises the question: if judiciary crosses its limits today, what stops others tomorrow? The Constitution is not a playground—and neither is Indian democracy.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
The explosive claims made by suspended officer Ranjit Kasle have ripped open the filthy underbelly of Maharashtra’s political-police nexus. If what he’s saying is even half true, then we’re not talking about governance—we’re talking about a full-blown criminal syndicate operating under the garb of administration. Bogus encounters? 50 crore payouts for fake killings? Orders coming behind closed doors from the highest levels of power? This isn't democracy, it’s state-sponsored gang warfare!Kasle openly states that fake encounters are “planned” with surgical precision—top CM-level meetings, secret green signals, hand-picked cops, and hush money. And let’s not forget the alleged EVM tampering hush money. If ministers are buying silence and using the police as hitmen, then what’s left of law and order?The fact that Kasle was suspended in just 6 hours—without due process—screams of political pressure. Meanwhile, real criminals roam free. Why hasn’t there been a judicial probe? Why isn't the media asking tougher questions? And where is the Home Ministry while all this filth piles up? If India doesn’t wake up now, the system will rot beyond repair.
🔽
🖋️ From the desk of Abhijeet Rane:
President Trump’s recent remarks on the U.S.-China trade negotiations reflect a dangerously optimistic view. While Trump praises China's initiation of contact for trade talks, this perspective overlooks the broader consequences of the trade war. The punitive 245% tariff on Chinese goods and China's retaliatory measures show a strained relationship that has disrupted global markets.Trump's claim that a trade deal could be reached in a few weeks seems unrealistic given the complexities involved. These discussions are deeply entangled with global supply chains and national security concerns. China’s halting of rare earth material exports to the U.S. demonstrates the high stakes at play.The Trump administration’s impulsive decisions have led to unpredictable economic consequences. This situation requires a more strategic approach, considering the global ramifications, rather than just short-term gains.
🔽
Comentarios